Pfsense throughput test

Pfsense throughput test. 2Gbit/sec from my test machine to the router. I posted a screenshot of my pfsense dashboard when my ports were bridged. Allerdings ist das nicht wirklich Aussagekräftig. The results form the WAN are very poor, I get around 47Mbit/s. pfSense low throughput from 10GB to 1GB Interfaces. 51. Funny thing is, that I tried to use a few different speed tests and nearly all showed 150MBps. These techniques can be used, among other things, for the static connection of two sites via a site-to-site connection. Unfortunately I am in the same boat as you, ~200Mbit/s taps out the virtio interface and pegs 2 cpu cores doing it (e1000 is even worse), rendering the connection useless. Oldest to Newest; Newest to Oldest; Most Votes; Reply. Port: The TCP port on the target used by the Troubleshooting Low Interface Throughput The most obvious test is to watch the firewall CPU load while transferring data. This is a required field. I'm not even sure if I trust the tests at this point. You need to run at least some actual throughput tests to determine if your indexing test is at all accurate I would say. enough throughput for a 10 Gigabit LAN with a 10 Gigabit WAN uplink Wireguard iperf3 tests. O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, In 2017, we have published a throughput test for pfSense 2. While this was a simpler tool, it was nice to easily check my speeds from the command line. APU2C0 IPFire throughput test - much faster than pfSense. As mentioned in Accessing Firewall Services over IPsec traffic initiated from pfSense® software will not normally traverse a tunnel without extra routing. Members Online • guack-a-mole. From what I've read, they're basically the same except for OPNSense has a better UI, better Wireguard support, and more packages, so I was leaning towards going with OPNSense. Wir bekommen hier einen aktuellen Intel N100 Prozessor mit 4 Kernen und 3. I am testing out the throughput with iperf3 on CARP interface, which is one of the nic's ports connected straight thru. Though it doesn't seem to test loadbalanced uploading. You should definitely set your limiter bandwidth slightly below your actual upload I now its better to test the Speed through the firewall and not from the firewall itself. (no - or limited access to the clients) Generally i would use it to test if the WAN Connection give me the 16Mbit the customer had buyed or if the connection is below 10MBit (or lower) regards, Franz Using iperf3, I was only able to get a stable 1. max throughput a bit over 1Gbps I'm running my home pfSense box on two 16GB USB Sticks with RAMdisk enabled, until I've got around my lazyness and actually put some SSDs in there. I wanted lowest idle power, but didn't mind spikes at home (was ok with higher TDP as long as idle power was The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. 4p3: WAN throughput performance Assuming you use a true multi-threaded test (like iperf -P8 or speedtest. You will never be able to sustain maximum CPU for a long time. net, but the results are very obvious (e. ADMIN MOD Hyper-V PFSense 2. Things have changed. The Xeon-D CPUs you tested both have turbo speeds of 2. Once it completes, if you get A or A+ grades on the BufflerBloat metric, you are probably good. Select the Information Type. 1. I've purchased a couple SG-1100's to test things out before I roll them to end users It provided for the highest throughput when I had a gig connection on my side and a 100 meg connection on the remote side. com or speedtest. Thanks!! Cheers M. However, I missed it and when I built the test kernel, I only removed a patch from the kernel-4. I think this may be interesting because many people here asking about OpenVPN hardware for their needs. A Nearly all hardware/drivers have issues with these settings, and they can lead to throughput issues. @stormi said in Poor pfSense WAN speeds (after XCP-ng updates?) @KernelCrunch There's still one thing that is confusing to me. Now they're splitting pfsense into CE and Plus version which is not open-source with more features. Why is OPNsense so bad at throughput in my tests? If it's not, what am I doing wrong? The commonality amongst these tests seems to be OPNsense, regardless if Let's test pfSense! pfSense 2. So far I have heard about Stress-ng from freebsd, but am struggling to find any newer installations from it, last mention I can find of it is here. The underlying operating system beneath pfSense® software can be fine-tuned in several ways. 5_1. A few years ago I wrote an article about good choices for pfSense hardware. When you run Speed Test, your IP address will be shared with Cloudflare and processed in accordance with our privacy policy. However, I came across multiple instances of people who Just found my solution. The internet would come into play using speedtest. This is always when virtio although those are better in my use cases). 19-6. pfsense is running on a machine with two intel xeon E5-2637 cpu's, 32GB ram. I also have pfSense running HAproxy on a home-built router. By default OPNsense supports IPsec and OpenVPN connections. BTW, our gateway Installing pfSense, IPFire, OPNSense on APU boards. last edited by hbauer . If the score does not improve, or gets worse, there is likely a problem with the configuration. Official Netgate® Hardware. com/sivel/speed To perform a test: Navigate to Diagnostics > Test Port. Iperf on pfsense is not a good test no. 27. Step 3) Upload both files (File 1 & File 2) to your server and change the permissions to 755. 13, both I plug linux and window computers into the LAN ports of my linksys home router wrt1200ac I could achieve 800 Mbits/sec throughput using exactly the same iperf test. Check your network performance with our Internet speed test. 0 GHz) and IIRC (it's been a while since I The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. First, we made a test without a router to assess the throughput of the connection that goes over a 1 Gbit switch. Granted lots of things could have changed in a years time. Scaling IPsec ¶ IPsec is well-suited to high throughput by default, especially given the advice above, but there are additional IPsec-specific tweaks which may help. Few weeks ago we have published a pfSense throughput test for PC Engines APU2C0 board, and got few people pfSense TCP throughput pfSense is a very popular firewall operating system. Only one graph at a time can be shown per browser window when using Status > Traffic Graph , but additional windows or tabs can be opened in the browser to see all WAN interfaces Performing a speed test online shows 60Mbps down and 11 Mbps up with the CPU hitting around 10% during that. It also shows the receive side is significantly more processor intensive. The best test to use depends on what you want to optimize. Apply Changes. Great! Enter OPNsense (23. It does a multiple stream download and upload to servers it determines If I run a speedtest directly inside pfsense, using speedtest-cli -h I get even worse speeds, around 3 upload and 300 download. Uses for iperf on pfSense software. But I am at a loss for how to measure simply and accurately! What techniques and command line tools do you use to measure throughput or network performance? Thanks! The new pfSense box is freshly installed with the newest 64bit pfSense, has 1 onboard Gbit card and 1 Gbit Intel Dual Head servercard. Where I was previously getting ~350-350mb down/~20up I get ~50mb down/~20 up on dev. That’s why we put together this pfSense web configurator menu overview. pfSense can be downloaded from the official website pfsense. Locate the Information panel on the page. [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0. The moment I turned on hardware nat offload, same speed tests showed around 950mbps and I've been getting that speed since. 5Gbe ports with an N100. 5 (amd64) Non-VLAN and pf Enabled: [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0. 9 Gbit/s, which is achieved when testing to the pfsense interfaces. 3. You should be seeing high 800's to low 900s for sure. iPerf3 is principally developed by ESnet / Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 0+ up Directly connected to the SG-3100 - 43. I would like to replicate this setup on my pfSense firewall which has 1x 10GB interface. APU VPN Performance. inet. Client/Test methods. serverius. This topic has been deleted. It does almost 10x the throughput you need while running every CPU intensive service I could muster on the machine I just bought a I340-T4 to throw into my Hyper-V box for use with pfSense and the other VMs I'm running. It is a How to measure the bandwidth using SpeedTest. I see similar traffic bandwidth as the screenshot above. Cloudflare uses your IP address to estimate your geolocation (at the country and city levels) and to identify the Autonomous System Troubleshooting Low Interface Throughput; Troubleshooting Multi-WAN; Troubleshooting NAT; Troubleshooting 1:1 NAT; Troubleshooting NAT Port Forwards; Troubleshooting NAT Reflection; Troubleshooting OpenVPN; Troubleshooting Windows OpenVPN Client Connectivity; The pfSense Documentation. ADMIN MOD Checklist for IPSec performance . Server listening on 5201. 10 (2 June 2018) pthreads Test parameter. pfSense tuning for 10 Gbit Throughput Frequency of my cpu is 2. 7. Use a Bufferbloat Test Site again and compare score now to the score before the test was run. However for the home user that SG-1100 Throughput Test. Updated Sept 27, 2021 to reflect py37-speedtest-cli package change. pfSense 2. Click View. In our case, we call it “Upload“. All of the In a basic setup, The Vault is capable of routing packets at wire speed on all ports for all models. After running some tests, it appears I am getting 999 Up/999 Down on the provided residential gateway but only an average of 500 Up/300 Down on my pfSense device. All tests have been performed using iperf3. I think the throughput should be at least twice as high as what I am getting. 25TB in 5 years. In order to order to understand what sort of device I would need, I carried a few informal tests: FW4B + OPNsense got around 750 Mbps ; FW4B + openwrt got around 780 Mbps ; FW4B + IPFire got around 550 Mbps ; ISP supplied router got around 780 Mbps Hi everyone! I installed Iperf on pfsense and I ran a test through one device from the LAN to the Firewall and another test through one device from the WAN to the firewall. Any suggestions on best practices in my case would be appreciated! The Netgate 6100 router running pfSense has a single core performance of 623kpps and a total chassis throughput of 2. 13 Mbit/s Testing upload speed Upload: 257. pf is somewhat multithreaded but OpenVPN is not. It seemed to preform the same. The free firewall solution OPNsense offers various options for configuring a VPN connection. 6 ms to 94. Test OpenVPN spee I ran pfsense a while ago and had no trouble with it, but if I went back to open-source firewall software today I'd try opnsense on principle. Figure 6: Running iperf on Cerberus as UTM This time, I measured an average throughput of 203 Mbps , with a peak of 231 Mbps ; CPU hit a utilization of just over 80% with using about 93% of available memory. I might leave a bit of upload throughput on the table, but I finally see low latency and no packet loss even under maximum upload stress. Lets see your test method and showing that your client and server can actually talk doing gig, etc. 76 upload: 502. I started with an issue where 2 ports were capped at 1. The Hostname and Port fields are required, the rest are optional. 5. Note from the author. Im vorliegenden Szenario schaute man zuerst auf die Gesamtauslastung der pfSense via Web-Interface, diese war dort selbst während des Tests knapp unter 40%. 10% of the WAN throughput If I run iperf3 as a server on the OPNsense LAN interface and hit it with a Proxmox or Windows Server client same result i. Don't forget to set up RAMdisk if you'd like to keep your warranty if there's still any, because pfSense just roasts the TBW rating in a few years. 05 on the N5105 2. Put a small switch between the firewall and the modem/CPE as a test. Using Using PCI direct passthrough with virtio drivers provided the best performance in my case and I was able to get around 2. The pfSense operating system allows the installation of iperf3 to check the speed of the local network, today in this article we are going to show you how to do it to check the performance. On the waveform I did have them all on igb1 (which worked in the past without issue), but recently spread them out to see if it would help with the speed (as I have seen people saying VLANs cut the throughput in pfSense). The information on Netgate What is the best way to measure the maximum throughput of a firewall (as packet filtering capacity and encryption performance)? Getting something strong, with enough horse Today I want to show you how we test the hardware with software for compatibility and achieved TCP throughput after the default installation. The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. TSO net. Version: pfSense 2. works so far. 4 installed on a 4GB SD card. 8 Mbit/s The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. hbauer gave exacting details of testing done showing 880's. The test network consists of 2 computers running Ubuntu 20. Speed Test. All of the interfaces are reporting 1000base-T Full Duplex in the pfSense software My group and I have now come to a part where we would like to run typical stress-tests on the pfSense VM, though we aren't very sure which ones are good for using in these tests. This is a new implementation that shares no code with the original iPerf and also is not backwards compatible. I could run tens of rounds of iperf test without experiencing any crash. Login into pfSense and Go to Diagnostics > Command Prompt. 3 and 10Gbit dual network adapter Intel X550-T2, the following additional hardware and software were used, see table. 96 Mbit/s. the way i tested does this measure wan-lan? or lan-lan? or none of them? It reports throughput BETWEEN a LAN system and pfSense. t3 instances are burstable CPU/credit model. The pfsense cpu use peaked at 19% during the test but was usually closer to 10%. I increased snaplen setting to 65535 and that makes a very small improvement. Open comment sort options. 26 Gbits /sec 67 So the Atom is being taxed. 9. 5-91. Only users with topic management privileges can see it. We provide tested hardware for pfSense, OPNsense, IPfire, ClearOS, RouterOS etc. Reset states to force all traffic to use new limiters. luke240778. If it does, the problems lies somewhere within the virtualization layer. Average speed is about 720 Mbits. When I first hooked up the ubiquiti edgerouter X to the above connection, my throughput via several online broadband speed tests showed around 250mbps, well short of 1gbps. Step 2) Create index. Testing to or from pfSense directly always gives poor results. Download: 456. org. Always make sure that the devices with which and from which you carry out the tests are not the cause of the problem. The "server" VM is on the WAN side of these firewalls, the client VM is on the "LAN" side. Limiters are also used internally by Captive Portal for per-user bandwidth limits. The routing, CARP, etc. 10, windows at 10. Members Online • [deleted] ADMIN MOD Determining max throughput and routing capability? Share Sort by: Best. 4-RELEASE-p3 pfsense gateways with retail intel x520-da2. For fiber, wireless, and other types of connections with a router outside of pfSense® software, try unplugging the Internet connection from the router, and also turning off the router itself. Today I want to show you how we test the hardware with software for compatibility and achieved TCP throughput after the default So I was able to use the same server on pfSense and my laptop (still wireless), and got these results: pfsense: Testing download speed. 58Mpps), about 6. 19. My NUC doing untunnelled iperf to pfsense gets 690Mbps. This will only test from the pfsense to the client. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Members Online • Duder995. 2Gbit So I install iperf on pfsense. On the Bling your pfSense with pfSense Gold page, click Next. Limiters are managed at Firewall > Traffic Shaper on the Limiters tab. I have two other VMs running as iperf3 server and client. Previously Netgate has a plan to upgrade Pfsense with better packet processor. Thoughts on why I'd be getting this? Both my PC and pfSense claim they're connected at 1000mbps (so I know the connection between them didn't Hi, we have two 2. small VM on AWS, connecting to an XG-7100 via an IPSec site to site tunnel. py https://raw. It seems pfSense still has issues with lack of throughput. In 2017, we have published a throughput test for pfSense 2. He gets 450 mbps throughput with no VPN and this is the case for the majority of users. During the pfsense<–->linux iperf test, the CPU In a basic setup, The Vault is capable of routing packets at wire speed on all ports for all models. Few weeks ago we have published a pfSense throughput test for PC Engines APU2C0 board, and got few people Linux vms on same host, also Debian machines (test partners for vm to vm tests) Linux on other directly connected physical host (test real physical throughput and CPU usage) Results non-routed: vm to pfsense on same virtual LAN: ~450 mbit/s vm to Linux on same virtual LAN: ~19,6 gbit/s. I Personally my upload bandwidth is small enough that Speedtest. The NIC's are intel It shows that pfSense is a bad TCP endpoint but that is known. My isp speed was updated to 800 mbps for download with 20 for upload but pfsense only shows 300 mbps for download with 10 for upload both from my browser and from speed test cli. I've experienced no throughput or other issues with this configuration, so I suspect it might be worth a try for you. 5-RELEASE-p1 - VM has 6 CPUs + 2GB ECC RAM dedicated on a Xeon E7 v2/Xeon E5 v2/Core i7 Proxmox Virtual Environment v6. 446 = 429. One that is plugged into the WAN port and one into the LAN port If I run speedtest from a Proxmox or Windows Server connected through OPNsense the throughput ranges from 850Mbps to 1900Mbps i. The CPU load during this test was 34%. For the iperf test: traffic was initiated on a host outside of the pfSense® I'm noticing huge throughput differences between development and production. It has been a while since I used ESXi, but I'd try to pass through the NIC to PfSense entirely, to test if that gives you 10G. Running directly off the modem/router provided by my isp, I get around 700 average. Knowing that a specific CPU tops out at 80Mbps on OpenSSL For each test it reports the bandwidth, loss, and other parameters. When running road warrior tests it was to a server behind the firewall. So some of the differences may not be attributable to pfSense. Members Online • sveach. 3, then it was updated for First let me start to say that running speedtest from a pfSense box should not be best practice for business use. Throughput shown on the screenshot below is about 112Mbit/s, but the acutal VPN throughput will be a bit lower (100Mbit/s) because of VPN tunnel overhead. 5_1 Couldn't get things working right, so I decided to plug it directly into the pfSense box even though I hear tell that PPP isn't always the fastest. I've had Pfsense 2. 20-50GB writes a day, which is somewhere between 35. Never try to run these tests with the router/firewall acting as a client or server, you will not get accurate results. All On the Limiters tab, click on the “+ New Limiter” button. Reply reply flobernd • I might try that. Regarding the hardware offloading options: Disabling Hardware Checksum Offloading did not make any difference in terms of When I first hooked up the ubiquiti edgerouter X to the above connection, my throughput via several online broadband speed tests showed around 250mbps, well short of 1gbps. Speedtest-CLI package will be installed into /usr/local/bin Do you want to test the pfSense or do you want to test the link to the internet (with pfSense). net. was just testing) and not seen any problems, but did follow the history of the old b/w issues and again, appears they were addressed. This leads to my believe that the Plus version will be the one Changing inline mode to legacy made it even worse. I have configured different VLANS on these interfaces. 5GbE Router PC and upgraded to the Plus version. The operating system on which pfSense and OPNsense are built on used to be a difference as well (with Hi, I'd like to do a simple hardware comparison between 2 machines running pfsense (just to get some very general idea on how fast these 2 machines Skip to main content. Cant seem to find it but I would get some In a basic setup, The Vault is capable of routing packets at wire speed on all ports for all models. The iPerf server is running, it is waiting for connections on the 5201 TCP port. 2 -> 2. The on prem network has 2. I built this security appliance at the end of Novem Granted lots of things could have changed in a years time. When I run 'speedtest-cli' from the commend line I am getting 108. Pretty high in that case. However when I did Google speed test, the result was 500MBps. Particularly at 10g. 63 Mbit/s. That would be a good initial test. 04. 2. Doing a speed test to some internet site with some client behind pfsense is NOT a valid test method. The pfSense® CE VM was configured with 4GB of RAM, and installed with the same settings shown on this article. It seems iperf speeds are unusually bad on this network. Ping times to my gateway run over a bit wider range during the tests, 6. Log in as admin, using the default password of pfsense. K. 0 now for a while on an old dell pc with 2 intel nics. Although people on the Netgear forum were claiming to get bare-metal speeds The main differences when comparing pfSense and OPNsense are in their user interface and update schedules, as pfSense targets three releases per year, while OPNsense schedules two major releases each year, with security updates every two weeks. General pfSense Questions. This can be observed from Diagnostics > System Activity or from the shell by running: top-aSH. 6. Even though I’ve kept that article up to date, after Read a recent thread on netgate forums and some mods there recommended not using iPerf running on pfSense to measure pfSense throughput. One out of 4 cores is hard at work. The following options are available on this page: Hostname: The IP address or hostname of the target system. On the Firewall side there’s a symmetric 600Mbit/s fiber line. Unfortunately, all this testing showed that my tried and true Zotac box was getting a little long in the tooth. Step 1) Create a domain/subdomain for your server. Kotty. but still getting a baseline comparison across different platforms can give you an "idea" of what to expect or not to expect out of a specific CPU. All of my connectivity is set up the way I like it (took me a while to get it all straight but I’m happy Hi, I've created a home lab to test VPN throughput between two VMs connected to PfSense VMs. @stephenw10 said in Wireguard poor throughput. They recommended running iPerf server and client on separate machines connected through pfSense. We have tested APU2C2 with NordVPN client and pfSense configured using AES-128-GCM cipher. The Beelink EQ12 physically consists of a 124 x 113 x 39 mm (4. tso=0 Note: This keeps turning back on I have it set to 0 in Hello! I’ve read pretty much every similarly titled post but none of the solutions recommended on prior posts have helped. However, I am not about to install the Dlink 665 again to find out out the true differences. : hat is the available bandwidth at the other s. L. Examples include This is why folks are advised to put the speedtest client on some endpoint inside your network so that you test throughput "through pfSense" and not "to pfSense". Learn More When you use Speed Test, Cloudflare receives the IP address you use to I've done a test of IPERF to measure the throughput of the pfsense. 3Mpps, which is sufficient for line rate in both directions at 1514b packets (1. You can check this in the interface overview or on the dashboard. To perform a test: The most obvious test is to watch the firewall CPU load while transferring data. r/PFSENSE A chip A close button. A quick update: I just ran 2 speedtests directly from the pfSense command line: 1st test with the physical NIC assigned as the WAN port: Browsing pfSense forum Ive found some intriguing quick OpenVPN performance test. The information types are explained in the next subsections. 4-13 Open vSwitch v2. net the maximum I get is only about 7. This section lists the components used, the parameters used and the test procedure. I have a 600mbps download and something like 100 up. Reply as topic ; Log in to reply. Since as you see, there is a major difference in speed going directly to the iperf server vs via the pfSense. You'll have near true IMIX traffic bandwidth in both directions. IPerf3 is built on a client-server Very simple Continuous Internet Speed Test (Bandwidth /Throughput Meter) that will estimate your ISP speed. 44 x 1. So what do you see from client to client on the same network? Because those speeds are terrible for gig. 00 sec 101 MBytes 844 Mbits/sec 38 226 KBytes Tests Directly connected to the RG - 650+ down / 400. It could be a cable, or “an anomaly” in the way the two interfaces talk to each other. After reviewing the output, click Back to return to the list of options. I´ve found the following commands, which drastically improved the throughput - peak-wise and providing a consistent throughput without dips: This binds one core/Thread to a queue - i´ve found this is also present in the pSense-documentation, but as a non professional i had to However, running a fast. In most cases, the new score should be an A or higher. Product overview Overview of hardware. What could be the issue here? It's all virtualized, CPU Attached are screenshots of the hardware config on Proxmox, advanced network options, and iperf tests between two VMs on the same VLAN then the same VM and the pfSense gateway ip for that VLAN. It depends what you have access to out on the net somewhere. 8. Also, you can try flow control: Tuning a 10GB Connection, i´ve spent many days to get the most performance out of pfSense. One of pfSense Software 2. I have not switched to 22. For most people, measuring things for their home networks, iperf3 is good because it tells you what throughput you can get for a single or small number of TCP connections or UDP endpoints (which is what most residential traffic is. true. 903. eltel. The iMix rating should be at least 2Gbps with all the features you Monitor the bandwidth in pfSense as you do all of this. I also had major issues with a Zoom last night where the video was buffering and dropping. 10. Finally. There seems to be something in the pfSense setup that messes with me. That's interesting indeed because when I tested an SG-2100 using dedicated service provider testing hardware, and the LAN throughput (vlan to vlan) Save. I completely reset pfsense to default settings, installed an Intel dual port 1G NIC, configured my WAN and LAN, ran the test and I am getting about the max speeds for 1G, 800-900 up and down. Best. Hi, if have done a short test with iperf3 on a SG1100. I had shaper configured to improve bufferbloat on a 400mb cable pipe from Spectrum. Thanks in advance. Any help would be greatly appreciated since I haven't been able to find anyone with this same issue. I run pfSense on a Cisco UCS C210 M2 with 2x x5650 and 24G RAM All in BIOS is set for throughput When I do test with speedtest. After setting up opnsense as a VM in proxmox for the first time, I was baffled as the speed through the firewall barely reached 10 mbit/s. C2758 had no issues with that and I got a throughput of 200 mbit/s without issues. 00-10. Why install iperf3 on pfSense? pfSense is a firewall-oriented operating system, which can also do router functionalities, both in “advanced” home environments and in small and medium-sized businesses. Enable Cross-origin resource Hello Friends, in this video tutorial i will tell you how to limit your internet bandwidth in pfsense on per ip address you can easily manage traffic shaper 10 votes, 23 comments. 3k. Site 1 (HA proxy): Bandwidth is 200/35 Site 2 - where traffic is being initialized - 500/500. There is a D-Link unmanaged switch between them. We have assembled the cheapest possible hardware configuration and performed few throughput tests. $ iperf -v iperf version 2. I get 1G throughput and no retries when testing from Hypervisor <-> Untagged VM jon@TracheServ: pfSense v2. They seemed to suggest iPerf server on pfSense kinda sucked. This throughput test was performed with PC Engines APU2C0 and pfSense 2. Bandwidth: the bandwidth of the pipe. 51 Mbit/s laptop: ping: 31ms download:392. 3 Mb/s). net, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 85. Testing on VirtualBox with virtio NICs still yields bad In this video, let's check out the SQM QoS performance of the NanoPi R6S with FriendlyWrt (a fork of OpenWRT). If an IRQ process for a network card is using a significant amount of CPU on a core, then either the hardware is being fully (or over) utilized, or the driver may need I am making various configuration changes and would like to do basic measurements of network throughput so am I confident of not introducing performance regressions. 8 Ghz (Xeon E3-1275 Turboboos) is a linear factor of 1,46 -> 5,0 Gbit/s -> 7,3 Gbit/s To debug this a bit more try setting up pfSense as a test with no NAT enabled. 1. Mine might be one more data-point for somebody in the market for hardware to run pfSense on. In this example, we will use a Linux host as the iperf server. Granted, that's a relatively low bar, but if you get the throughput you expect it at least vets the path from your LAN hosts through the VM to the pfSense guest instance. 5 p1. 1 yet. About. This is NOT an effective way of The two sites are interconnected by a 1Gb link and the iperf test integrated in pfSense (between the WAN addresses of the two pfSense instances) returned the expected values Please note that this test doesn't involve the IPSEC VPN tunnel. 6. Add the following as a Loader Tunable: net. On the pfSense Setup page, click Next. By default pfsense is pretty damn secure, when the user starts messing around with settings is when you start to have security issues. In the past I have done a similar test but downloading to a remote machine a file I have hosted here behind pfSense. I have also tried a LAG setup with the 3 interfaces (didn't make a difference). I saw a thread regarding the google speed test showing higher results, which it does, usually 300-500Mbps while the ookla speed test suffers the worst speeds of 90-250. 4. Developed and maintained by Netgate®. TCP Throughput measurement is performed after successful compatibility test without configuration adjustments In the case of pfSense v2. Select the Device to view. update The following chart displays the average observed throughput speeds on a pfSense® CE VM for each Vault. (example: iperf. Get pfSense 2 Cookbook now with the O’Reilly learning platform. Top Always performance test from the outside in, one device Free and Open Source Speedtest. Take note of both download and upload speeds from this test as we will need it later. Slowness can not always depend on the device hosting pfSense. Run a test from wireguard or ipsec out of Hi Everyone, No caching going on, its really a test of throughput, the testing is direct to Cox’s headend. Results routed: My ISP provides service at 1Gb. That said throughput out with the pfsense if it is not really powerful enough. Let’s run the iperf in server mode: # iperf3 –s. I run pfSense and have posted some of my experience here if you want to look it over. That helped to get proper internet speed at LAN side too. 1 version of Linux and 2 Vaults running pfSense® CE version 2. 2Gbit of imix traffic, and about 419Mbit of 64b packets. Looked at the thread @Pippin linked to and here are some numbers based on methodology that was suggested for estimating throughput (the second set of numbers are for another pfSense firewall I decided to test as well):. 7 Mbits/s, compared to the expected bandwidth of approx. Read broadband news, information and join our community The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. Tests were completed via iperf3 as well as the Speedtest® CLI. Posted by Pawel Suwala on Aug 27, 2017 Update 2019-02-10: It turns out it's possible to configure APU2 to run at full gigabit on pfSense, when using more than one connection. e. 3 pfSense Speed Test – Conclusion. net -P 1 Client connecting to speedtest. When running iperf server on the pfsense box, this is the CPU load. Here the packets sent are 1420 octets each, including L2 headers, and we tested bi-directional throughput, as one can clearly imagine scenarios where the tunnels are ‘full’ in both directions in a true site-to-site application. Like HFSC and CBQ, Limiters may be nested with queues inside other queues. Note that we can define a bandwidth according to a schedule If you don't want to use Docker Image, Follow the steps. 6GHz): AES-256-CBC: 3200/7. With a Netgate – Docs – Troubleshooting Low Interface Throughput. 10 was used on the clients. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Step 4) You need to make a few changes on your server. There is a Verizon tower about 3/4 a mile away from me, and when I run a speed test I get about 20-25 megs down, and about 7-9 up. Loading More Posts. 4Ghz. tso="0" IP Input Queue Remember if you want to use your pfSense installation to protect your wireless network, or segment multiple LAN segments, throughput between interfaces must be taken into account. 0 Slow WAN speeds . I have a librespeed speedtest server running in a docker container on my Synology nas (DS920+). 5 2. 4, and PC Engines released several BIOS updates for APU. At the same time, disable pf in the advanced settings. To view information about a drive: Navigate to Diagnostics > SMART Status. 00-1. 0 KByte (default) A speed test checks the maximum speed of your connection to a remote server on the internet. All tests were performed with the following parameters: Server: iperf -p 5000 -f m -s IPerf is an open-source command line tool designed to test network throughput between two network hosts. I rebuilt my home lab and bought new hardware to run pfSense which has worked great. The problem is, I'm only getting 270-300 Mbits/s of throughput in an IPSec tunnel. hbauer. It lists all of the menus found in a stock pfSense installation and provides a brief overview of each of them, with Can someone tell me how to setup iperf on pfsense so i can test throughput to my clients antennas? I want the iperf server to be pfsense, and want to test thoughput to the clients antennas IP address. I can push 900+ Mbps with pfSense on a Celeron J1900 CPU (quad-core, 2. 88 x 4. 1 and clients, linux at 10. There may also be problems between the WAN and the modem/CPE. html (or a page from the same domain) file and paste our widget code. This might be a fairly easy fix, but I can't seem to get the full throughput of network speeds through pfsense. You can use iPerf to quickly measure the maximum network bandwidth (throughput) between a server and a client, and conduct stress testing of the ISP link, router, network The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. My pfsense box gets the public IPv4 address and also uses IPv6 Prefix Delegation to get /64 for my LAN (I only have a single LAN - it's a bit more work to get multiple /64 prefixes but it's certainly doable). 5. The wireless card is mounted in APU2C4 APU2C0 can route about 620Mbit on pfSense 2. ; Name: the name of the pipe (alphanumeric characters and underscore only). It's a useful test to prove it's linked at >1Gbps but not much else. net to my ISPs speedtest server. A reboot fixed it. It could be the client himself or the way he connects. There are free and You should use two devices that are on the network that pfsense routes for and run IPerf tests between them. pkg update ; pkg install -y py37-speedtest-cli. 6Gbps but a BIOS update fixed that. I will repeat tests with Untangle 5. It's configured to be a router not a server. The Netgate 6100 router running pfSense has a single core performance of 623kpps and a total chassis throughput of 2. Compatibility is given when the I'm using vlan with a managed Netgear switch to test the T520 in a RoaS configuration. The results from the LAN are correct, I get around 900Mbit/s. All of the Use our NEW speed test tool to test how fast your broadband or mobile internet connection really is. Also check out SR-IOV. g running 4 speedtests sequentially, alternating between snort off/on and the results come back as Throughput through the pfsense firewall is 12. To test (theoretical) throughput: 1. xcpng8. If that works, the tunnel is up and working properly. 6GHz. 7. 3 on APU2C0 that showed a maximum throughput of about 620Mbit/s. For an example of running a scheduled task from the pfSense UI, I recommend this blog post. I'm setting up a home network with a Unifi AP and a firewall, and I was wondering whether I should use PFSense or OPNSense. However, doing a hardwired test running speed test cli on my Synology, I get this: For cable and DSL connections, try powering off the modem/CPE, and in a separate test, unplug the coax or phone line from the modem. Like its predecessors, iPerf3 tests the bandwidth between any two networked computers to determine if the available bandwidth is large enough to support the transmission of an application. Click Test. Hi, I have the following HA - Setup: Edit 2: got wireguard set up, and current tests from my test machine across the internet into pfsense and writing to my NAS i'm getting about 700-800mbps speeds. Relevanter ist da entweder an der Console oder via ssh und folgendem I have installed pfsense 22. 119. 0. If you just want to test the link, you can use the iperf package. The basic functionality is pretty much ok, but we have a few doubts If you have problems with the back-to-back tests with pfSense, you have narrowed down the problem to the pfSense box: Go into BIOS on pfSense box and disable any power-saving features (APIC, etc). On the Test settings. 2 and the MTU. edit: It's easy for a router and link to do a single stream in one direction at a In this post, I show how to measure the bandwidth using SpeedTest. iPerf was orginally developed by NLANR/DAST. I had preformed some speedtests before doing this, connected directly to the default single LAN port on the pfSense box, and am pretty sure that I was experiencing the slow speeds. I just made the switch from esxi to proxmox (KVM) this week and neglected to test pfsense throughput before putting my machine back into colo. ADMIN MOD new package / best practices (crowdsec) Hello! We at CrowdSec are preparing a first release of a pfSense package. Interfaces: "Relevant" Settings: MBuf clusters kern. @hpman83 said in Throughput issue on a virtualized Pfsense:. I reenabled them, restarted pfSense If pfSense software is unable to reach the throughput needs for a given use case, see the TNSR product page for more information. This is to test traffic throughput of the router itself. The test also displays a real-time graph, regarding the The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. Let’s look at Figure 6, running the same iperf test, under the same conditions that we used for our IDS Firewall. githubusercontent. The pfSense Setup wizard. @bmeeks Ive been running speed tests through the firewall - both using iperf3 on different VLANs that run through pfsense, and speedtest. generate secret: openvpn --genkey --secret /tmp/secret 2. If you’re new to pfSense, the sheer number of menus in the web configurator can be intimidating, and you may also be wondering what a few of them are for. 5: 1846Mbps Personally my upload bandwidth is small enough that Speedtest. Using Untangle I wasn’t able to get the bursting or the throughput, I later found out there were problems with Untangle 5. Und dabei ist der Prozessor mit 6 Watt TDP angegeben. In environments where extremely high throughput through several interfaces is required, especially with gigabit interfaces, PCI bus speed must be taken into account This is CPU load just tunnelling incoming iperf traffic (i. The articles are kept around for the For the test, I have setup a small network lab In this video, let's check out the SQM QoS performance of the NanoPi R6S with FriendlyWrt (a fork of OpenWRT). Sometimes disabling via sysctl is also necessary. 53 inches) square plastic case and is available with a choice of four I also noticed that when PowerD was enabled with maximum profile iperf achieved a higher throughput, like 320-330 mbps, but after a few rounds of testing the box pfsense crashed. That plugin is reporting 200Mbps. 5 - 8 Gbit/s and CPU Usage never pass 5% I tried Opnsense first before migrating to Pfsense and honestly the difference is just the UI part. Whoever may come here later searching for similar pfsense speed related issues, will suggest to play with these 3 options under System>Advanced>Networking/Network Interfaces :: Hardware Checksum Offloading, I fully understand the OpenSSL test is not a true test of overall VPN performance since there are so many other portions to OpenVPN. Would be really A 4K60 HDR tutorial to build a robust 10Gbps router using affordable components with long life expectancy. The iPerf allows to generate TCP and UDP traffic (load) between two hosts. Earlier in the thread you said that the update that brought the performance regression was kernel-4. Fixing the bloat I’m having an interesting phenomenon happening with throughput on a locally-hosted speedtest server. Test software. 4 GHz Taktrate. Expand user menu Open settings menu. The real time traffic graphs under Status > Traffic Graph and on the Traffic Graphs dashboard widget are useful for showing the real time throughput on WAN interfaces. If you have read a few of my articles, you know I think running pfSense router software is a great idea. pfsense version: 2. However, when doing the speed test through the pfSense router, I'm only getting 90-95mbps. . This test was done by one of the Vyos maintainers and he was able to get nearly 10 gig routing between two clients with pfsense When sizing hardware for pfSense® software, required throughput and necessary features are the primary factors that govern hardware selection. For a 1 Gbps ethernet interface, the actual data throughput is ~940 Mbps due to overhead in an IP packet. For the test, I have setup a small network lab Just wondered if these throughput figures are reasonable? retransmits seem to be quite high? pfsense is installed on a baremetal Dell R320, Xeon E3-1231 v3 @ 3. My FW4B did not have sufficient cpu power to manage the bandwidth. It is possible to get much higher speeds than your advertised rate direct to their headend. But since I noticed the improvement, without the speed test, I thought I should post a glowing review of pfSense. The iPerf3 test gave the following results: From 1GB interface (HP 331i) to 10GB interface (HP 560): [ 4] local "IP" port 52811 connected to "IP" port 5201 ID] Interval after setup pfsense, speeds have gone down from 950 Mbits/sec to 380 better to use the official PVE firewall (from the GUI), instead of counter-productive pfsense it is known that full VM (like pfsense require) hurts performance comparing to lightweight LXC containers Thanks guys - I appreciate the input. Don´t think a small firewall is able to get the same out as your ISP given router that is ASIC/FPGA based and pimped! There is all done in silicon but pfSense But in many cases i need to test it from the pfsense itself. net directly from the pfSense GUI. As an example, here is the latest speedtest ran directly from the pfSense shell: Download: 469. This would When running iperf server on the pfsense box, this is the CPU load. The choice of encryption technique depends strongly on the required throughput. The goal is to connect two PC's on the WAN and LAN and test the maximum throughput (w/ & w/o WiFi throughput test. Fill in the fields on the page. Install SpeedTest-CLI command-line from speedtest. 4, CPU: Intel Celeron G4900 CPU @ 3. Doing a bidirectional test (iperf -d) gets about 50% and 50%, but the aggregate throughput falls to 581 Mb/s (538 and 43. UPDATE: tested iperf3, with a macbook as the server and the protectli/router as the client. I am using KVM as a hypervisor. net), have you tried if the interface speed is really 1000 MBit/s? I just had this fallback to 100 MBit/s on an otherwise 1000 MBit/s link on a Nokia ONT. 6 Ghz, scaling to 3. 8 . I'm disappointed that i couldn't figure out why pfsense couldn't give me the same results that a TrueNAS vm did for throughput, but not to concerned since i'm now getting on the The easiest test for an IPsec tunnel is a ping from one client station behind the firewall to another on the opposite side. net gets good consistent results. We use the pfsense as the central router in our network. So the issue seems to be while pfSense is getting the full internet speed, it is not pushing out the same speed to the Win 10 client. ipc. I use one intel port for WAN, the other for LAN (to my servers) and the onboard for OPT1 to my local network. Let's see if we get better Viewing Drive Information¶. Hopefully, Intel knows best. Useful in scenarios where portions of the internal network are behind links slower than the firewall network interface. I have tested with my laptop connected to their modem and speed reports are in the 1Gb range. The latest BIOS v4. 2 / 70. 82 Mbit/s Upload: 453. tcp. Cables are CAT6. @bmeeks I'm gonna try to plug a computer directly after the router to see if there is any difference. And trouble shooting on a business implementation should not need this widget. There are free and open to the public iperf servers. I mean speed test on start was showed correctly, but after a moment the whole firewall stopped to respond, and I had to restart it. 5_1 Test your Internet connection. It is probably better than your router software. 5GB Down, 1GB up. I am running 21. It will build an AWS managed VPN gateway thing, hopefully more performant and less to manage. Running Linux on the router yields very similar results. For HyperV Gen2 VMs, I've had to disable RSC to get consistent throughput. When we have a router-on-stick network architecture, and pfSense itself manages all the VLANs that we have in the network, it is possible that the trunk link Die Hardware Appliance’s von HUNSN sind einfach die beste Symbiose zwischen Performance, Preis-/Leistung und Anforderung an eure Hardware. so no one here uses or knows anything about iperf? 1 Reply Limiters are currently the only way to achieve per-IP address or per-network bandwidth rate limiting using pfSense® software. Do you want to test the pfSense or do you want to test the link to the internet (with pfSense). Test Again¶. Install iperf on two clients. In my specific case it's been bad throughput or inconsistent throughput using virtio NICs on both pfSense and OPNsense. No Flash, No Java, No Websocket, No Bullshit. During the test, pfSense showed about 60% CPU usage, and 10% Memory usage, which makes me think that the real When you run a speed test from a machine on the local network, you measure the throughput of the chain that includes the LAN connection and the WAN connection. The items to be configured are the following: Enable: check this box to enable the pipe and its queues. Don't change a setting unless you absolutely knows what it does, unless your just learning then change all of them :) Reply reply Unfortunately, hardware plays a big role in pfSense's performance, so you can't throw out hardware capabilities. But when running a speed test through pfsense, I only get 50mbps down and 10mbps up. For the speed tests the tool iperf version 2. the mimugmail repository provides a speedtest plugin. iperf running on my ethernet-wired Ubuntu NUC, not the pfsense box). The data to be It's now possible to get full gigabit throughput when utilizing multiple NIC queues. 2 is supposed to enable CPU boost to 1. Reply as topic; Log in to reply . So after bridging, I tested again, and didn't think much of it. Compex wle200nx and wle600vx wireless throughput test on pfSense and IPFire. That is on my Cox Cable connection that is running at about 32 mbps up and 11 mbps down which should be stressing my pfsense box a lot more than your connection does yours. Powered by Cloudflare's global edge network. H. last edited by . pfSense vs OPNSense This is a collection of articles in which we publish our own, real-life throughput tests, installation instruction, and infrormation related to networking. but there was something I was reading that says running the iperf server on pfsense itself is not the best way to test the throughput because of some limitation. 12. My setup: 1gig/1gig fiber, PFsense 2. Then I wanted to test the speed of each interface. 40GHz 8 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 hardware threads, 32GB RAM, QP Intel 10gb network card. The release is obviously quite new and I've only seen one other comment on the upgrade post regarding slowness, so I'm attempting this to get a I did a test now on my C2758 @ home, but the fastest IPsec link I had to test with was "only" 200 mbit/s. 5 ms. With that done, try a iperf test again. In this video, let's check out the router throughput and power Some commands I've used in this video:To get the script if you are on a BSD-based firewallfetch -o speedtest. If after showing valid test methods and default config - then yeah open a support ticket. Look for any adjustments to the PCI bus - re-run tests; Go into pfSense and disable any h/w offloading, r/x checksumming, h/w VLANs, etc - re-run tests The pfSense® project is a powerful open source firewall and routing platform based on FreeBSD. I have a Hunsn RJ38. Hello, I am running pfSense on a t3a. This article was originally written for pfSense 2. ) When you use Speed Test, Cloudflare receives the IP address you use to connect to Cloudflare’s Speed Test service. If you get anything less, I recommend following the next steps to fix it. This is the definitive answer. I've tried going For some reason, when I do the speed test from my computer directly to the modem, I get the ~940mbps expected. On the General Information page, type in gw01 as your Hostname, accept the other default settings, and click Next. net) If you want to test the pfSense there's no way around using additional devices besides the pfSense itself. Ok. 5 and 2. Unless you have severely anemic hardware, the number of users in your office during working hours should make no difference in network speed through the pfSense Determining our throughput requirements This recipe will explain how to determine the throughput requirements, and subsequently the processing and memory requirements needed in our environment. The results: For the SG-5100, using the WireGuard implementation in pfSense 2. Der Stromverbrauch wird uns also nicht auffressen. net test with the same laptop, hardwired the same way, except this time to the LAN port of the pfSense box: I only get about 280-300 MB/s down and ~270 MB/s up. OpenVPN Throughput (Estimated) - Intel i3-8100 (4 x 3. Test methods and results: (pfsense with 10. 4. 80 GBytes 3. 4Gbit/sec from my test machine to the router. @muckmuck I don't have a great comprehensive approach, but it seems to me like a decent first step would be to run iperf between one or more clients on your LAN and the pfSense machine. Ensure the options are checked. The only packages I have installed are pfblockerng, speedtest cli and NUT. Actually it is a GRE tunnel over IPsec, because gre interfaces are so much easier to deal with for everything related to policy routing, firewalls, traffic Now I run a test with a 20 Mbit/s WanUpload limiter (slightly below the actual upload throughput): This looks much better. I just checked and had not re-enabled hardware checksum offload, hardware TCP segmentation offload and hardware large receive offload on the System->Advanced-Networking page. This test runs in your browser. One of Neither is real life, but which one is closest depends on what you’re doing. what i've done is i entered the pfsense box via ssh and run iperf -s, then with my pc i did iperf -c pfsense. But in many cases i need to test it from the pfsense itself. Then run on wired client to pfsense on the WAN ip address? No, this wont test the throughput. pfSense released several OS updates, we are now on 2. pfSense is optimized to route traffic from interface A to With pfSense® software, there are several methods for monitoring bandwidth usage, with different levels of granularity. Please note, many of the articles below are for the discontinued APU hardware line. VERY HAPPY with these results. g running 4 speedtests sequentially, alternating between snort off/on and the results come back as Hi, we have two 2. Use iPerf Tool to Test Network Speed/Bandwidth. 19. But client to client through pfsense is good test. pftop¶ If a connection is currently active, connect to The industry standard way is to get a packet generator to measure packets per second at 64b and calculate your iMIX rating. 0 ISP: Comcast 1Gb Cable I have also confirmed a direct test against only the modem brings ~950Mbit/s. So, I disabled PowerD and iperf results went back to 235-250 mbps. Is throughput a requirement? If not, you've done the job try using AWS VPC plug-in for pfsense on your XG. This can be observed from Diagnostics > System Activity or from the shell by running: top -aSH. 10GHz, 12 GB RAM, Intel 1000/Pro Quad NIC, As argument, with N3150 (Gigabyte N3150N-D3V), I can tell you that in a client to client Iperf test, I was getting 160 Mbit/s throughput, I used: No crypto hardware selected (meaning AES-NI will be used automatically if it`s supported, N3150 does) Hello. 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0. Let’s now look at some examples of using iPerf to test network throughput. I have tried a second PC (i5, 15GB DDR3 Put a small switch between the firewall and the modem/CPE as a test. 00 sec 3. Single thread test: From a LAN PC: iperf -c speedtest. (no - or limited access to the clients) Actually this is a good thing to use if you suspect your switch or cabling may be contributing to a loss of bandwidth. That lopsidedness is very interesting. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise . Enabled the check box for Hardware Checksum Offloading. nmbclusters=65536 Note: I had it set to 1M, just lowered it to 65K to see if anything changed. What specific model of nas do you have? And I can help you figure out which synology iperf you pfSense throughput testing details with iPerf 3. It achieved about 100Mbit The speed test/buffer bloat tests will start and should finish in a minute. dxz bkdq ygtabie ebjqv jcyl tkj mwgyzm xkoe htzk egqwpr